COVID: How do you separate opinion from fact?
The average person genuinely believes that the media has been following ‘the science’ but what if those preciously clung-to “facts” were really just strong, one-sided opinions, designed to create and maintain a certain response?
Despite the fiasco of ludicrously inaccurate predictions from computer models (not to mention that Imperial College and Neil Ferguson were funded by Bill Gates), huge amounts of false data from PCR tests that were never meant to be used diagnostically — let’s see, a PawPaw tasted positive for COVID for God’s sake — and a lot of false data coming from the overwhelming pressure “from the top” to label everything as a ‘COVID death’, the science is still the best we’ve got, right?
Let’s not concern ourselves with officials manipulating the data because they really didn’t want to ‘get it wrong’, or control our beliefs about the seriousness of COVID.
The science, at least, agreed that masks were never that effective, so we were told it wasn’t necessary to wear one if you were healthy. Now, suddenly, they are ‘mandatory’… shame it’s been almost five months since the virus broke.
We’ve been categorically told to stay in to ‘flatten the curve’ but now we’re told to be even more afraid because there’s a predicted ‘second wave’ of infections coming… because… we were all told to stay in!
Masks, by the way, can actually deprive the person wearing it of critical oxygen needs — two chinese boys aged 14 fell down dead whilst jogging with a mask. A five year old could notice the problem with mask wearing in a heartbeat but still, ‘the science of mask wearing’ must be listened to! Just ignore good old common sense.
Staying at home, whilst the economy collapses, and many people go broke and others below the breadline starve to death… how ‘scientific’ is that?
Staying at home, whilst your immune system drastically weakens… how ‘scientific’ is that?
Absurd, yes, scientific, no.
Telling everyone to stay 2m/6ft apart is based on what exactly?
In a confined space, where a nanoparticle can easily spread, people think 6ft is going to do it? No, the masks people are wearing won’t stop a viral spread of disease but, hey, it looks cool, and it defines us. We don’t care about freedoms and free speech anymore.
And then, on the other side of ludicrous, people are now wearing masks in nature , just in case a virus leaps 60ft from another person through a tree and several bushes.
It’s okay to carry on smoking, drinking, eating junk and fast foods, avoid exercising (stay home, remember!) and stay in fear, for God’s sake… all of this is, apparently, scientific. The “best science” we’ve got is, apparently, ignoring the question of immunity, say our governments. Only a vaccine is the magic bullet answer that we must wait for – and pay for. All the crap you test your body with every day, that isn’t having a disastrous effect. Just ignore that data.
Anyone who tells you that building up your immunity can save you is a ‘conspiracy theorist’ nutter. Avoid them at all costs!
Let’s just ignore the hard-to-understand topic of immunity – and make the virus the scapegoat instead? It helps our politicians feel good and it’s less effort, I find.
Practically nobody has control over death… Only scientists… and doctors… and, oh yes, governments. The last group really care, and they’re really powerful too… with God-like complexes.
The science says that everyone must stay locked up for months on end, and run back inside at the slightest sign of a virus. Okay, it’s the same old reductionist paradigm played out on a larger scale but it’s worked for Pharma for the last 100 years, so why stop now?
The theory that the human being is “only physical” (despite all the NDEs, spontaneous healings of various diseases and placebo effects doing better than actual drugs) and since the virus is 100% a physical thing, we must need medical intervention again — so we can go back to doing what we were always doing. I mean, who has time to do things that improve their health? We’re all trying to get rich, or get by.
85-98% of people will be fine without intervention but Bill Gates wants to vaccinate 100% of all humans on the planet. He’s NOT a scientist — now there’s a fact you can count on.
Let’s all forget about millions of years of evolution, and the fact that the human body deals with trillions of bacteria and viruses every day, and uses them to adapt and stay healthy.
Let’s also ignore the fact that no other facts can appear online contrary to the government or WHO’s script because of Facebook and YouTube’s mass censorship of any science or scientific viewpoint that goes against ‘the official narrative’.This is, well, you know, because science only has one point of view ever, and the rest of those saying otherwise must be ‘conspiracy theorists’.
Of course, let’s not forget the fact that the media are run by an unelected shadow government (Bill Gates and friends), who also control our actual governments and institutions — by giving them lots and lots and lots of money.
The people haven’t failed to notice that their brand of TV science says ‘do this’, so long as those in charge can look forward to a huge payoff of BILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
Things are starting to add up… people are starting to see through the cracks… but let’s get back to the reductionist science shall we?
That way we can feel safe about ‘not feeling safe’.